Here at the Illuminated Showman we are very interested in the Placebo effect. We do believe that this strange and highly interesting phenomenon of self healing is an important key not only to the origin of Showmen but the genuine healing properties of showmanship.
The early Shamans, which we believe to have been proto-showmen using the very special and intimate connections of showmanship to actually heal the sick. The shamans role was that of healer, spiritual leader or guide so a mix between priest and doctor as well as a form of sacred entertainer. {You can read more about this Showman / Shaman link here
the power of tricks,
truth in reality and deception.}
I do believe that an understanding of the nature of the Placebo effect will explain in one big swoop why the whole arsenal of alternative medicine has some effect in healing people. The theory below, that there might be an on/off switch controlled by our minds that can turn on a full immune-system response or not seems to shed some light on a possible mechanism for this strange effect.
"There is a simple explanation, says
Trimmer: the immune system is costly to run - so costly that a strong
and sustained response could dangerously drain an animal's energy
reserves. In other words, as long as the infection is not lethal, it
pays to wait for a sign that fighting it will not endanger the animal in
other ways."
As unique performers we do not have the luxury of being able to take sick days. During a run of shows at a festival we cant ring in and say we cant make it. Often, particularly in smaller companies or for certain in solo shows not showing up is not an option. SO I have myself experienced that I might feel a little under the weather during a season but as soon as it ends it becomes a full blown flu or something akin to it. There are even cases when I think I am well as can be only to find the first week of my holiday being hampered by a bug of some sort. If what the researchers below is true it would explain this phenomenon of "sickness on days off".
From an evolutionary stand point it makes a lot of sense to get sick, or to "give in to" the sickness when some stressor vanishes. The mechanism would of course have been more important when the stressor was a dangerous mammoth hunt, where not only your own life and those of the hunters was in danger but the possible starvation of the whole clan.
{It turns out that this idea was first proposed by Nicholas Humphrey which has
recently been featured on this site.}
The article below is from the {
New Scientist}
Evolution could explain the placebo effect
{06 September 2012
by
Colin Barras}
ON THE face of it, the placebo effect
makes no sense. Someone suffering from a low-level infection will
recover just as nicely whether they take an active drug or a simple
sugar pill. This suggests people are able to heal themselves unaided -
so why wait for a sugar pill to prompt recovery?
New evidence from a computer model
offers a possible evolutionary explanation, and suggests that the immune
system has an on-off switch controlled by the mind.
It all starts with the observation that something similar to the placebo effect occurs in many animals, says
Peter Trimmer,
a biologist at the University of Bristol, UK. For instance, Siberian
hamsters do little to fight an infection if the lights above their lab
cage mimic the short days and long nights of winter. But changing the
lighting pattern to give the impression of summer causes them to mount a
full immune response.
Likewise, those people who think they
are taking a drug but are really receiving a placebo can have a response
which is twice that of those who receive no pills (
Annals of Family Medicine,
doi.org/cckm8b). In Siberian hamsters and people, intervention creates a mental cue that kick-starts the immune response.
There is a simple explanation, says
Trimmer: the immune system is costly to run - so costly that a strong
and sustained response could dangerously drain an animal's energy
reserves. In other words, as long as the infection is not lethal, it
pays to wait for a sign that fighting it will not endanger the animal in
other ways.
According to Humphrey's picture, the
Siberian hamster subconsciously acts on a cue that it is summer because
food supplies to sustain an immune response are plentiful at that time
of year. We subconsciously respond to treatment - even a sham one -
because it comes with assurances that it will weaken the infection,
allowing our immune response to succeed rapidly without straining the
body's resources.
Trimmer's simulation is built on this
assumption - that animals need to spend vital resources on fighting
low-level infections. The model revealed that, in challenging
environments, animals lived longer and sired more offspring if they
endured infections without mounting an immune response. In more
favourable environments, it was best for animals to mount an immune
response and return to health as quickly as possible (
Evolution and Human Behavior, doi.org/h8p).
The results show a clear evolutionary benefit to switching the immune
system on and off depending on environmental conditions.
"I'm pleased to see that my theory
stands up to computational modelling," says Humphrey. If the idea is
right, he adds, it means we have misunderstood the nature of placebos.
Farming and other innovations in the past 10,000 years mean that many
people have a stable food supply and can safely mount a full immune
response at any time - but our subconscious switch has not yet adapted
to this. A placebo tricks the mind into thinking it is an ideal time to
switch on an immune response, says Humphrey.
Paul Enck at the University of
Tübingen in Germany says it is an intriguing idea, but points out that
there are many different placebo responses, depending on the disease. It
is unlikely that a single mechanism explains them all, he says.